FireFly Media Server › Firefly Media Server Forums › Firefly Media Server › General Discussion › Great job
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 12 months ago by rpedde.
-
AuthorPosts
-
16/09/2007 at 7:40 PM #1732paraquatParticipant
Hello,
I’ve been using mt-daapd for several years now (since well before it was called Firefly), and it occurred to me I’ve never given any feedback about how great it is! I currently have 29000 tracks served off a NSLU2 running Debian which I play using iTunes on a laptop through an Airport Express, and honestly I’ve never had major troubles! Admittedly, I guess I’m an advanced user since I’ve installed vanilla debian instead of unslung, I build nightlies from source by hand, etc.
The reason I started using this for my music was to have an airport-capable music library that I can tag and manage using Musicbrainz (I don’t like the way iTunes can’t sync its library to a directory, but it’s the only player that supports the airport), and it’s been perfect for that. Tag stuff with Musicbrainz, hit the scan button in the web ui, and I am good to go (eventually, the NSLU2 is not exactly a speed demon at 266mhz even with the underclocking resistor removed)
Outstanding work!
17/09/2007 at 2:06 AM #12580rpeddeParticipant@paraquat wrote:
I’ve been using mt-daapd for several years now (since well before it was called Firefly), and it occurred to me I’ve never given any feedback about how great it is! I currently have 29000 tracks served off a NSLU2 running Debian which I play using iTunes on a laptop through an Airport Express, and honestly I’ve never had major troubles! Admittedly, I guess I’m an advanced user since I’ve installed vanilla debian instead of unslung, I build nightlies from source by hand, etc.
Sweet… Thanks. 🙂
… hit the scan button in the web ui, and I am good to go (eventually, the NSLU2 is not exactly a speed demon at 266mhz even with the underclocking resistor removed)
That’s next on my list to work on. I think moving playlists back out of the db and restoring the gdbm backend should have a good effect on the performance of the slug. That’s that last major thing I want done before a stable release. Keep watching nightlies (once we’re past the file handling breakage), and I expect performance to improve substantially.
— Ron
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘General Discussion’ is closed to new topics and replies.